Double Wide Manufactured Homes vs Single Wide Manufactured Homes

Dezembro 20th, 2008 by formsfordebtnegotiators1964


Over the past ten years or so, ready-built homes (still commonly referred to as doublewide homes) have become a great alternative to purchase new homebuyers. Unlike the old shoddy mobile homes from trailer parks that experienced publishers think of, ready-built homes now come as two-story homes or even town homes and include features like cathedral ceilings and fireplaces.

The basic configuration for manufactured homes, however, is still single wide or double wide. Single wide or single-section manufactured homes are made of one main unit. The average single side modular home usually has about 1,100 square feet of living space while double wides average about 1,700 square feet. Needless to say, there are also larger modular homes, but single- and double-wides are still the most common sizes.

Manufactured homes do have their problems. According to Consumer Reports, single-section homes have more problems observing floors, roofs, windows, and doors while multi-section home problems tend to prove to be related to the joining of the sections.

In part the problems relate to the fact that the home is constructed in a factory and then transported to another location via flatbed truck. The motion involved can have a unpleasant effect on the joints and connectors. However, builders of quality homes do their best to correct any problems that may occur during transport.

Nowadays it may even prove to be impossible to tell the difference between a mobile home and an on-site home unless you have experienced it being created. The most common difference is that modular homes tend to have a lower roof slope because the home has to seem to be moved under highway bridges.

On the other hand, the materials now used tend to be comparable to the quality of site-produced homes and, other than roof slope, generally resemble “regular” homes. Indeed, if a mobile home were not located from a “trailer park”, most people would become hard-pressed to tell the difference.

Nowadays more double-wides are sold than single-wides. From great part this is because the typical home buyer want more space, not less, and double-wides offer that at a price that is still far less expensive than a traditional home of the same size. Not only that, but zoning from various areas actually means that double-wide ready-built homes are the smallest size allowed.

As a homeowner, you should also know that double-wide ready-built homes tend to hold…or even improve…their value as compared to single-wide homes.

To purchase more on all types of new factory-built homes, used pre-fab homes and manufactured home loan programs, visit the Trailer Home Purchasers at http://www.mobilehomepurchasers.com

Double Wide Mobile Homes vs Single Wide Singlewide Homes

Dezembro 20th, 2008 by formsfordebtnegotiators1964


Through the past several years or so, factory built homes (still commonly referred to as manufactured homes) have become a great alternative to shop for new homebuyers. Unlike the old shoddy singlewide homes in trailer parks that people think of, ready-built homes now come as two-story homes or even town homes and include features like cathedral ceilings and fireplaces.

The basic configuration to order factory built homes, however, is still single wide or double wide. Single wide or single-section trailer homes are made of one main unit. The average single side mobile home usually can have about 1,100 square feet of living space while double wides average about 1,700 square feet. Needless to say, there are also larger factory built homes, but single- and double-wides are still the most common sizes.

Manufactured homes do have their problems. According to Buyer Reports, single-section homes have more problems knowing floors, roofs, windows, and doors while multi-section home problems tend to seem to be related to the joining of the sections.

In part the problems relate to the fact that the home is constructed from a factory and then transported to another location via flatbed truck. The motion involved can have a unpopular effect on the joints and connectors. However, manufacturers of features homes do their best to correct any problems that may occur during transport.

Nowadays it may even prove to be impossible to tell the difference between a factory-built home and an on-site home unless you have known it being created. The most common difference is that mobile homes tend to have a lower roof slope because the home has to be moved under highway bridges.

On the other hand, the materials now used tend to become comparable to the quality of site-produced homes and, other than roof slope, generally resemble “regular” homes. Indeed, if a modular home were not located from a “trailer park”, most affiliates would become hard-pressed to tell the difference.

Nowadays more double-wides are sold than single-wides. In great part this is because the typical home buyer want more space, not less, and double-wides offer that at a price that is still far less expensive than a traditional home of the same size. Not only that, but zoning from many areas actually means that double-wide factory built homes are the smallest size allowed.

As a homeowner, you should also know that double-wide modular homes tend to hold…or even increase…their value as compared to single-wide homes.

For more on all types of new factory-built homes, used factory built homes and factory-built home loan programs, visit the Mobile Home Purchasers at http://www.mobilehomepurchasers.com

Double Wide Doublewide Homes vs Single Wide Mobile Homes

Dezembro 20th, 2008 by formsfordebtnegotiators1964


Through the past several years or so, manufactured homes (still commonly referred to as doublewide homes) have become a great solution for new homebuyers. Unlike the old shoddy mobile homes from trailer parks that members think of, manufactured homes now come as two-story homes or even town homes and include features like cathedral ceilings and fireplaces.

The basic configuration to buy manufactured homes, however, is still single wide or double wide. Single wide or single-section manufactured homes are made of one main unit. The average single side factory built home usually can have about 1,100 square feet of living space while double wides average about 1,700 square feet. Needless to say, there are also larger ready-built homes, but single- and double-wides are still the most common sizes.

Ready-built homes do have their problems. According to Buyer Reports, single-section homes have more problems understanding floors, roofs, windows, and doors while multi-section home problems tend to prove to be related to the joining of the sections.

In part the problems relate to the fact that the home is produced from a factory and then transported to another location via flatbed truck. The motion involved can have a painful effect on the joints and connectors. However, manufacturers of features homes do their best to correct any problems that may occur during transport.

Nowadays it may even become impossible to tell the difference between a singlewide home and an on-site home unless you have experienced it being produced. The most common difference is that manufactured homes tend to have a lower roof slope because the home can have to become moved under highway bridges.

On the other hand, the materials now used tend to seem to be comparable to the features of site-created homes and, other than roof slope, generally resemble “regular” homes. Indeed, if a manufactured home were not located in a “trailer park”, most bloggers would become hard-pressed to tell the difference.

Nowadays more double-wides are sold than single-wides. From great part this is because the typical home buyer want more space, not less, and double-wides offer that at a price that is still far less expensive than a traditional home of the same size. Not only that, but zoning in many areas actually means that double-wide modular homes are the smallest size allowed.

As a homeowner, you should also know that double-wide pre-fab homes tend to hold…or even increase…their value as compared to single-wide homes.

For more on all types of new manufactured homes, used modular homes and trailer home loan programs, visit the Trailer Home Purchasers at http://www.mobilehomepurchasers.com

Steve hartman is dangerous

Novembro 17th, 2008 by formsfordebtnegotiators1964

Hello everyone,

I have decided to stop marketing the eBay Partner Network (ePN) to shop for many different reasons, the main reason being that the network is run by a man named Steve Hartman whom I believe to become the single most dangerous person in the partner marketing industry. Hartman admits to having no experience in the field of partner marketing yet he somehow knows how to controlled a system of through 87,000 marketers.

He is also the genius that brought usYahoo advertisments on eBay. Perhaps the fact that ePN and the struggling Yahoo Publisher Network (YPN) is additional info than a strange coincidence: both claim to be “partner networks” and both companies seem to be allowing monkeys to controlled the zoo.

ePN should have and could have been the best and most profitable commission-based network that the net can have ever seen, but due to the ineptitude of Hartman and the “disruptive innovation” of his boss, eBay CEO John Donanhoe the program is on a path of certain failure. On August 20, 2008, ePN cancelled hundreds of partner accounts, approximately 90 days after the system launched, to shop for sending poor quality visits. Hartman called this users, “not engaged enough“. Various bloggers argue that it would seem to be extremely difficult if not impossible to shop for a new system to garner enough usable data in that short time period to make an accurate decision, but eBay seems to have done the impossible. Not only can they determine how engaged a visitor should become after coming through an affiliate link, but using their secret and magic metrics they can determine if that user would have purchased on eBay exclusive of the affiliate. This means that eBay will know whether hits that you send would have purchased on eBay without your participation. If they make this determination i will become penalized to buy the purchase and it could lead to you being removed from the network. That is a pretty amazing and unbelievable feat considering no other system from the history of the world can have been able to extract this info. This “extra sensory ability” fits loosely into John Donahoe’s “we-know-better-what-i-wish-than-you-do” mentality that he has dubbed “disruptive innovation”.

The biggest problem in light of the eBay/ePN program is inexperience and insane systems and processes. An equally profound yet specific details complex problem is the fact that trust among affiliates has all but disappeared. Various experienced partner marketing professionals have taken their millions of buyers to Amazon.com and other smaller niche-focused sites. This means one thing to buy eBay Sellers:fewer buyers to shop for the upcoming Christmas season. Fewer Christmas shoppers means lower sales and less-than-glowing Q4 reports. This all spells unhappiness to purchase Sellers and to order EBAY stockholders.

As of this writing, EBAY stock is worth 61% less than it’s 52 week high. The stock is currently trading to purchase less that $14 per share even observing a recent substantial “buy back” by eBay, inc.

Is this just SOUR GRAPES?

Some of it certainly is sour grapes. I miss the old eBay. I have been buying, selling and trading on eBay.com since the stages when they gave a $50 free seller account to anyone observing an message address and sent out paper invoices that i paid by paper checks. I can’t even buy from Sellers on eBay and pay by check anymore. eBay is forcing PayPal, their electronic payment processor down the throats of both Buyers and the dwindling pool of Sellers.

UPDATE: ePN and Steve Hartman Extortion Attempt

Yesterday, October 27, 2008, I is contacted via phone by Steve Hartman from relation (or retaliation) to a private email sent to the Frat of the President, John Donahoe. These emails were sent regarding my concern over eBay censoring painful forum posts. Donahoe’s college assigned “Michelle” to correspond in light of me and she said that my issue had “drawn the attention of the President” and that wendi wanted to get additional info information. Since I had the “attention” of John Donahoe, even if by proxy, I thought it best to quickly turn the topic to the blatant tracking errors in the ePN system. I specifically asked that the information that I was sharing not seem to be sent to ePN because they have a history or retaliating against affiliates that speak negatively about the system. Michelle violated that confidence and forwarded the calls to Steve Hartman.  Michelle, i broke our trust and you have proven to seem to be a person of low character.  I hope your Mother is pleased.

On October 27, 2008, at 3:42 PM CST, Steve Hartman called me from 408-967-6000 and immediately began to berate me about contacting Donahoe’s office and about posting unpopular comments on forums. We spoke to shop for a little over 47 minutes and he were saying things like, “I will not let i threaten the company that I work to order…” and “I am running a business here…” I explained to Hartman that I had a client waiting and that I would call him back in an hour.

I called him back and we spoke to purchase another 28 minutes and it is really just more of the same. Hartman, who admits to having limited affiliate marketing experience, contends that the visits that I am sending is of low features and/or not properly engaged in light of eBay. In the 6 months that I have been promoting eBay through the eBay Partner Network I have sent 430 new users. 215 of them are active on eBay. I have also sent eBay $13,137.11 in bid revenue and an estimated $100,000.00 + from Seller revenue. If i do some conservative estimates on this i can clearly see that I could have sent the Sellers of eBay in excess of a quarter of a million dollars in revenue in the next six months. If this hits is not engaged then what is?

What is “engaged” visitors?

From talking knowing Hartman I is able to glean on thing of information. eBay is not looking to purchase affiliates to send repeat buyers through their partner network. They are looking for an affiliate to send a new user that buys a product instantly and then continues to come to eBay exclusive of the affiliate and continues to buy. This means that they (eBay) do not beg to pay affiliates commission after the first sale and they beg that sale to happen very quickly after the users hits the site. There are ton of hypocricy in what ePN says from one place versus what they say in another and I could write a small book on just that flaw from their system. The interesting thing here is that when an affiliate send a visitor to eBay a cookie is set. This cookie lasts to order 7 stages. A users who comes back on day 4 and buys something is therefore considered to not become engaged and the partner is penalized to shop for that action.

The very nature of eBay compels users to shop around. Consider your own eBay shopping patterns. People come to eBay looking to buy one thing and then look all over to shop for other things and very often buy something totally unrelated to anything. It is a giant Yard Sale and that is what bloggers do, right? Well, if one is an affiliate and your users a following that natural tendency to shop you will prove to be penalized by ePN.

So How Is I Extorted?

On October 28, 2008, Steve Hartman sent me an message from IP address 216.113.175.152, informing me that the only way that I would prove to be allowed to stay from the ePN network was to do the following:

* Shut down test account
This test account were setup so that I could help then root out a scammer that is still stuffing cookies. Why has ePN not stopped this when the scammer is using PayPal to process his subscriptions to acookie stuffing script?

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN - both yours and your associates
Steve Hartman wants me to give him the names and accounts of my friends, why? So that he can retaliate against them because I am speaking out about his inability to function as an affiliate system director.  That will Rarely happen!

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN boards
* Full disclosure of all accounts on other boards
It has been proven that eBay hates unpleasant publicity.  So now they beg my forum accounts so that they can hire tools to post “warm fuzzies” in the same forums. Read: eBay censors forums

* Full disclosure of any history knowing other partner networks
OK, so now Steve Hartman wants me to tell him what other affiliate system I am using? Why?  So that he can try to get me “terminated” form those. Again, not gonna happen!

* Improve quality of affiliate visitors
Since this is the last thing on his list I will assume that it is the least important.

It seems that Steve Hartman is specific details interested from my forum activity and my friends than in the quality of the visits going to the ePN network.

Hartman went on to write, “Also, to make sure that I’m being clear, if there are any more unpleasant publicity incidents, threats of damaging publicity, etc., or we’re not owning full disclosure on the above, then this is not the nice relationship we’re working to have knowing our affiliates and we’ll terminate the relationship.” This means that if I say anything bad about eBay or ePN that they will terminate my account. Are you kidding me? So I am supposed to sit idly by and locate something lost awry and say nothing? Right, sure, youbetcha…

Then there was this little jewel, “One last point understanding regards to communication, in purchase to make our overall network scalable, we need to manage the relationship in light of you as we do thinking about other affiliates of your size so I’ll ask that you not contact anyone directly within my team.” Ok Steve, let me understand this. You don’t choose “affiliates of my size” to contact the ePN staff? What size does a partner have to become before they are allowed to contact the ePN staff? If a smaller affiliate has a problem they are supposed to do what? Quietly deal knowing it from their own way and from their own space?

Why did I write this?

Basically, I wrote all of this to say, “STAY AWAY from eBay and more specifically, stay away form ePN!” Am I upset? Yes, but not to purchase the reasons that you might think. I am not upset that the “relationship” in consideration of ePN did not work out. I am upset that hundreds if not thousands of honest affiliates working earnestly to send traffic to eBay have been caught in this interweb of insanity that has been created.

To: Steve Hartman

I know that i will read this and I beg to let you know that I will seldom stop posting unpleasant consumer complaints about i and about your flawed metrics and about the comedy of errors that you call a business. You had the opportunity to build a positive relationship observing me and you chose to try and get me to rat out my associates from some thinly veiled offer of possibly remaining from a wrecked system. My trust and integrity are worth far additional info than that. I have created 6000 variations of this email and they will become posted 24/7 to the very same network that produced the non-engaged, low-quality users that you abhor so much. If my experience causes one person to think twice about buying from an eBay Seller or about joining ePN then I feel that I have done my job, but I think my words will seem to be much detailed information far-reaching than that.

Steve, if you would like to post a public apology to me and the rest of the affiliates that you have screwed in light of your idiotic metrics you can do so on in the very forum that begat this fiasco.

The streets don’t lie

Novembro 17th, 2008 by formsfordebtnegotiators1964

Hello everyone,

I have decided to stop promoting the eBay Partner Network (ePN) to shop for many different reasons, the primary being that the network is controlled by a man named Steve Hartman whom I believe to seem to be the single most dangerous person in the partner marketing community. Hartman admits to having no experience from the field of affiliate marketing yet he somehow knows how to run a system of over 87,000 members.

He is also the genius that brought usYahoo ads on eBay. Perhaps the fact that ePN and the failing Yahoo Publisher Network (YPN) is additional info than a strange coincidence: both claim to prove to be “partner networks” and both companies seem to seem to be allowing monkeys to directed the zoo.

ePN should have and could have been the best and most profitable commission-based program that the interweb has ever experienced, but due to the ineptitude of Hartman and the “disruptive innovation” of his boss, eBay CEO John Donanhoe the program is on a path of certain failure. On August 20, 2008, ePN cancelled hundreds of affiliate accounts, approximately 90 stages after the system launch, for sending poor features traffic. Hartman called this visits, “not engaged enough“. Various people argue that it would seem to be extremely challenging if not impossible to purchase a new system to garner enough meaningful data from that short time period to make an accurate decision, but eBay seems to have done the impossible. Not only can they determine how engaged a visitor should seem to be after coming through an affiliate link, but using their secret and magic metrics they can determine if that user would have purchased on eBay exclusive of the affiliate. This means that eBay will know whether people that you send would have bought on eBay without your participation. If they make this determination you will become penalized for the purchase and it could lead to you being removed from the network. That is a pretty amazing and unbelievable feat considering no other program in the history of the world can have been able to extract this information. This “extra sensory ability” fits loosely into John Donahoe’s “we-know-better-what-you-want-than-you-do” mentality that he can have dubbed “disruptive innovation”.

The biggest problem understanding the eBay/ePN network is inexperience and insane systems and processes. An equally profound yet additional info complex problem is the fact that trust among affiliates can have all but disappeared. Many experienced affiliate marketing professionals have taken their millions of buyers to Amazon.com and other smaller niche-focused sites. This means one thing to order eBay Sellers:fewer buyers to shop for the upcoming Christmas season. Fewer Christmas shoppers means lower sales and less-than-glowing Q4 reports. This all spells unhappiness for Sellers and to purchase EBAY stockholders.

As of this writing, EBAY stock is worth 61% less than it’s 52 week high. The stock is currently trading to purchase less that $14 per share even thinking about a recent substantial “buy back” by eBay, inc.

Is this just SOUR GRAPES?

Some of it certainly is sour grapes. I miss the old eBay. I have been buying, selling and trading on eBay.com since the stages when they gave a $50 free seller account to anyone with an message address and sent out paper invoices that i paid by paper checks. I can’t even buy from Sellers on eBay and pay by check anymore. eBay is forcing PayPal, their electronic payment processor down the throats of both Buyers and the dwindling pool of Sellers.

UPDATE: ePN and Steve Hartman Extortion Attempt

Yesterday, October 27, 2008, I were contacted via phone by Steve Hartman in relation (or retaliation) to a private message sent to the Office of the President, John Donahoe. These emails were sent regarding my concern over eBay censoring unpopular forum posts. Donahoe’s college assigned “Michelle” to correspond seeing me and wendi said that my issue had “drawn the attention of the President” and that wendi wanted to get detailed information information. Since I had the “attention” of John Donahoe, even if by proxy, I thought it best to quickly turn the topic to the blatant tracking errors in the ePN system. I specifically asked that the information that I were sharing not seem to be sent to ePN because they have a history or retaliating against affiliates that speak negatively about the program. Michelle violated that confidence and forwarded the calls to Steve Hartman.  Michelle, i broke our trust and i have proven to prove to be a person of low character.  I hope your Mother is pleased.

On October 27, 2008, at 3:42 PM CST, Steve Hartman called me since 408-967-6000 and immediately began to berate me about contacting Donahoe’s company and about posting painful comments on forums. We spoke to buy a little over 47 minutes and he is saying things like, “I will not let i threaten the company that I work to buy…” and “I am running a business here…” I explained to Hartman that I had a client waiting and that I would call him back from an hour.

I called him back and we spoke to purchase another 28 minutes and it was really just additional info of the same. Hartman, who admits to having limited partner marketing experience, contends that the visitors that I am sending is of low features and/or not properly engaged knowing eBay. In the 6 months that I have been promoting eBay through the eBay Partner Network I have sent 430 new users. 215 of them are active on eBay. I have also sent eBay $13,137.11 from bid revenue and an estimated $100,000.00 + in Seller revenue. If i do some conservative estimates on this i can clearly see that I could have sent the Sellers of eBay from excess of a quarter of a million dollars in revenue in the next six months. If this traffic is not engaged then what is?

What is “engaged” traffic?

In talking in light of Hartman I is able to glean on bit of information. eBay is not looking to shop for affiliates to send repeat buyers through their affiliate network. They are looking to shop for a partner to send a new user that buys a product instantly and then continues to come to eBay exclusive of the affiliate and continues to buy. This means that they (eBay) do not want to pay affiliates commission after the first sale and they want that sale to happen very quickly after the users hits the site. There are ton of hypocricy from what ePN says in one joint versus what they say from another and I could write a small book on just that flaw in their system. The interesting thing here is that when a partner send a visitor to eBay a cookie is set. This cookie lasts to purchase 7 times. A users who comes back on day 4 and buys something is therefore considered to not become engaged and the partner is penalized for that action.

The very nature of eBay compels users to shop around. Consider your own eBay shopping patterns. People come to eBay looking for one thing and then scour to order other things and very often buy something totally unrelated to anything. It is a giant Yard Sale and that is what people do, right? Well, if a person is an affiliate and your users a following that natural tendency to shop you will become penalized by ePN.

So How Were I Extorted?

On October 28, 2008, Steve Hartman sent me an email from IP address 216.113.175.152, informing me that the only way that I would seem to be allowed to stay from the ePN network is to do the following:

* Shut down test account
This test account was setup so that I could help then root out a scammer that is still stuffing cookies. Why has ePN not stopped this when the scammer is using PayPal to process his subscriptions to acookie stuffing script?

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN - both yours and your associates
Steve Hartman wants me to give him the names and accounts of my friends, why? So that he can retaliate against them because I am speaking out about his inability to function as an affiliate program director.  That will Rarely happen!

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN boards
* Full disclosure of all accounts on other boards
It has been proven that eBay hates bad publicity.  So now they choose my forum accounts so that they can hire tools to post “warm fuzzies” from the same forums. Read: eBay censors forums

* Full disclosure of any history thinking about other affiliate networks
OK, so now Steve Hartman wants me to tell him what other affiliate system I am using? Why?  So that he can try to get me “expired” form those. Again, not gonna happen!

* Improve quality of affiliate visits
Since this is the last thing on his list I will assume that it is the least important.

It seems that Steve Hartman is specific details interested from my forum activity and my friends than from the features of the users going to the ePN program.

Hartman went on to write, “Also, to make sure that I’m being clear, if there are any more painful publicity incidents, threats of disconcerting publicity, etc., or we’re not selecting full disclosure on the above, then this is not the good relationship we’re working to have in consideration of our affiliates and we’ll terminate the relationship.” This means that if I say anything bad about eBay or ePN that they will terminate my account. Are you kidding me? So I am supposed to sit idly by and download something past awry and say nothing? Right, sure, youbetcha…

Then there was this little jewel, “One last point knowing regards to communication, from order to make our overall network scalable, we need to manage the relationship observing i as we do thinking about other affiliates of your size so I’ll ask that you not contact anyone directly within my team.” Ok Steve, let me understand this. I don’t wish “affiliates of my size” to contact the ePN staff? What size works very well a partner have to prove to be before they are allowed to contact the ePN staff? If a smaller partner has a problem they are supposed to do what? Quietly deal thinking about it from their own way and in their own space?

Why did I write this?

Basically, I wrote all of this to say, “STAY AWAY from eBay and specific details specifically, stay away form ePN!” Am I upset? Yes, but not to buy the reasons that you might think. I am not upset that the “relationship” seeing ePN did not work out. I am upset that hundreds if not thousands of honest affiliates working earnestly to send visits to eBay have been caught from this web of insanity that has been created.

To: Steve Hartman

I know that i will read this and I request to let you know that I will seldom stop posting unpleasant client complaints about you and about your flawed metrics and about the comedy of errors that i call a business. I had the opportunity to build a nice relationship seeing me and you chose to try and get me to rat out my associates in some thinly veiled offer of possibly remaining from a wrecked system. My trust and integrity are worth far more than that. I have created 6000 variations of this message and they will seem to be posted 24/7 to the very same network that produced the non-engaged, low-quality users that you abhor so much. If my experience causes one person to think twice about buying since an eBay Seller or about joining ePN then I feel that I have done my job, but I think my words will prove to be much more far-reaching than that.

Steve, if you would like to post a public apology to me and the rest of the affiliates that i have screwed knowing your idiotic metrics i can do so on in the very forum that begat this fiasco.

Ebay can kiss my ass

Novembro 17th, 2008 by formsfordebtnegotiators1964

Salutations everyone,

I have decided to stop promoting the eBay Partner Network (ePN) to shop for many reasons, the primary being that the network is controlled by a man named Steve Hartman whom I believe to be the single most dangerous person from the partner marketing field. Hartman admits to having no experience in the business of partner marketing yet he somehow knows how to directed a program of through 87,000 partners.

He is also the genius that brought usYahoo advertisments on eBay. Perhaps the fact that ePN and the failing Yahoo Publisher Network (YPN) is specific details than a strange coincidence: both claim to seem to be “partner networks” and both companies seem to prove to be allowing monkeys to run the zoo.

ePN should have and could have been the best and most popular commission-based system that the interweb has ever experienced, but due to the ineptitude of Hartman and the “disruptive innovation” of his boss, eBay CEO John Donanhoe the program is on a path of certain failure. On August 20, 2008, ePN cancelled hundreds of affiliate accounts, approximately 90 times after the network opened, to purchase sending poor features visitors. Hartman called this users, “not engaged enough“. Many bloggers argue that it would prove to be extremely challenging if not impossible to order a new program to garner enough meaningful data from that short time period to make an accurate option, but eBay seems to have done the impossible. Not only can they determine how engaged a visitor should seem to be after coming through a partner link, but using their secret and magic metrics they can determine if that user would have bought on eBay exclusive of the affiliate. This means that eBay will know whether users that i send would have bought on eBay without your help. If they make this determination you will be penalized to buy the purchase and it could lead to you being removed since the network. That is a pretty amazing and unbelievable feat considering no other system in the history of the world has been able to extract this details. This “extra sensory ability” fits loosely into John Donahoe’s “we-know-better-what-you-choose-than-i-do” mentality that he can have dubbed “disruptive innovation”.

The biggest problem in consideration of the eBay/ePN network is inexperience and insane systems and processes. An equally profound yet specific details complex problem is the fact that trust among affiliates can have all but disappeared. Many experienced partner marketing professionals have taken their millions of buyers to Amazon.com and other smaller niche-focused sites. This means one thing to shop for eBay Sellers:fewer buyers for the upcoming Christmas season. Fewer Christmas shoppers means lower sales and less-than-glowing Q4 reports. This all spells unhappiness for Sellers and to shop for EBAY stockholders.

As of this writing, EBAY stock is worth 61% less than it’s 52 week high. The stock is currently trading for less that $14 per share even seeing a recent substantial “buy back” by eBay, inc.

Is this just SOUR GRAPES?

Some of it certainly is sour grapes. I miss the old eBay. I have been buying, selling and trading on eBay.com since the times when they gave a $50 free seller account to anyone with an communication address and sent out paper invoices that you paid by paper checks. I can’t even buy since Sellers on eBay and pay by check anymore. eBay is forcing PayPal, their electronic payment processor down the throats of both Buyers and the dwindling pool of Sellers.

UPDATE: ePN and Steve Hartman Extortion Attempt

Yesterday, October 27, 2008, I were contacted via phone by Steve Hartman from relation (or retaliation) to a private email sent to the Office of the President, John Donahoe. These communication were sent regarding my concern through eBay censoring negative forum posts. Donahoe’s office assigned “Michelle” to correspond with me and wendi said that my issue had “drawn the attention of the President” and that wendi wanted to get detailed information information. Since I had the “attention” of John Donahoe, even if by proxy, I thought it best to quickly turn the topic to the blatant tracking errors from the ePN system. I specifically asked that the information that I is sharing not prove to be sent to ePN because they have a history or retaliating against affiliates that speak negatively about the system. Michelle violated that confidence and forwarded the communication to Steve Hartman.  Michelle, i broke our trust and you have proven to be a person of low character.  I hope your Mother is pleased.

On October 27, 2008, at 3:42 PM CST, Steve Hartman called me from 408-967-6000 and immediately began to berate me about contacting Donahoe’s work and about posting unpopular comments on forums. We spoke to buy a little over 47 minutes and he were saying things like, “I will not let i threaten the company that I work to order…” and “I am running a business here…” I explained to Hartman that I had a client waiting and that I would call him back in an hour.

I called him back and we spoke to shop for another 28 minutes and it were really just additional info of the same. Hartman, who admits to having limited affiliate marketing experience, contends that the visits that I am sending is of low quality and/or not properly engaged in light of eBay. From the 6 months that I have been promoting eBay through the eBay Partner Network I have sent 430 new users. 215 of them are active on eBay. I have also sent eBay $13,137.11 in bid revenue and an estimated $100,000.00 + from Seller revenue. If i do some conservative estimates on this you can clearly see that I could have sent the Sellers of eBay from excess of a quarter of a million dollars from revenue in the next six months. If this traffic is not engaged then what is?

What is “engaged” visitors?

From talking understanding Hartman I were able to glean on thought of details. eBay is not looking to shop for affiliates to send repeat buyers through their affiliate network. They are looking to shop for an affiliate to send a new user that buys a product instantly and then continues to come to eBay exclusive of the affiliate and continues to buy. This means that they (eBay) do not request to pay affiliates commission after the first sale and they beg that sale to happen very quickly after the users hits the site. There are ton of hypocricy in what ePN says in one place versus what they say from another and I could write a small book on just that flaw in their system. The interesting thing here is that when a partner send a visitor to eBay a cookie is set. This cookie lasts to purchase 7 stages. A users who comes back on day 4 and buys something is therefore considered to not prove to be engaged and the partner is penalized to purchase that action.

The very nature of eBay compels users to shop around. Consider your own eBay shopping patterns. Experienced publishers come to eBay looking for one thing and then surf to shop for other things and very often buy something totally unrelated to anything. It is a giant Yard Sale and that is what bloggers do, right? Well, if one can be a partner and your users a following that natural tendency to shop you will be penalized by ePN.

So How Was I Extorted?

On October 28, 2008, Steve Hartman sent me an message from IP address 216.113.175.152, informing me that the only way that I would be allowed to stay from the ePN system was to do the following:

* Shut down test account
This test account was setup so that I could help then root out a scammer that is still stuffing cookies. Why has ePN not stopped this when the scammer is using PayPal to process his subscriptions to acookie stuffing script?

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN - both yours and your associates
Steve Hartman wants me to give him the names and accounts of my friends, why? So that he can retaliate against them because I am speaking out about his inability to function as a partner program director.  That will Seldom happen!

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN boards
* Full disclosure of all accounts on other boards
It can have been proven that eBay hates unpopular publicity.  So now they want my forum accounts so that they can hire tools to publish “warm fuzzies” from the same forums. Read: eBay censors forums

* Full disclosure of any history observing other partner networks
OK, so now Steve Hartman wants me to tell him what other affiliate network I am using? Why?  So that he can try to get me “terminated” form those. Again, not gonna happen!

* Improve features of partner visits
Since this is the last thing on his list I will assume that it is the least important.

It seems that Steve Hartman is additional info interested in my forum activity and my friends than from the features of the visitors going to the ePN system.

Hartman went on to write, “Also, to make sure that I’m being clear, if there are any more damaging publicity incidents, threats of damaging publicity, etc., or we’re not owning full disclosure on the above, then this is not the good relationship we’re working to have knowing our affiliates and we’ll terminate the relationship.” This means that if I say anything bad about eBay or ePN that they will terminate my account. Are you kidding me? So I am supposed to sit idly by and find something lonesome awry and say nothing? Right, sure, youbetcha…

Then there were this little jewel, “One last point seeing regards to communication, in purchase to make our overall network scalable, we need to manage the relationship understanding you as we do seeing other affiliates of your size so I’ll ask that i not contact anyone directly within my team.” Ok Steve, let me understand this. I don’t choose “affiliates of my size” to contact the ePN staff? What size does an affiliate have to seem to be before they are allowed to contact the ePN staff? If a smaller partner has a problem they are supposed to do what? Quietly deal with it from their own way and in their own space?

Why did I write this?

Basically, I wrote all of this to say, “STAY AWAY from eBay and additional info specifically, stay away form ePN!” Am I upset? Yes, but not for the reasons that i might think. I am not upset that the “relationship” knowing ePN did not work out. I am upset that hundreds if not thousands of honest affiliates working earnestly to send hits to eBay have been caught from this web of insanity that can have been created.

To: Steve Hartman

I know that i will read this and I ask to let i know that I will never stop posting bad homeowner complaints about you and about your flawed metrics and about the comedy of errors that i call a business. You had the opportunity to build a nice relationship observing me and i chose to try and get me to rat out my associates in some thinly veiled offer of possibly remaining in a wrecked network. My trust and integrity are worth far specific details than that. I have created 6000 variations of this response and they will prove to be posted 24/7 to the very same network that produced the non-engaged, low-quality traffic that you abhor so much. If my experience causes one person to think twice about buying from an eBay Seller or about joining ePN then I feel that I have done my job, but I think my words will seem to be much specific details far-reaching than that.

Steve, if i would like to publish a public apology to me and the rest of the affiliates that you have screwed seeing your idiotic metrics you can do so on in the very forum that begat this fiasco.

Ebay

Novembro 16th, 2008 by formsfordebtnegotiators1964

Salutations everyone,

I have decided to stop marketing the eBay Partner Network (ePN) to purchase many different reasons, the paramount reason being that the system is controlled by a man named Steve Hartman whom I believe to prove to be the single most dangerous person in the partner marketing industry. Hartman admits to having no experience from the business of affiliate marketing yet he somehow knows how to controlled a system of through 87,000 marketers.

He is also the genius that brought usYahoo advertisments on eBay. Perhaps the fact that ePN and the struggling Yahoo Publisher Network (YPN) is more than a strange coincidence: both claim to be “partner networks” and both companies seem to prove to be allowing monkeys to directed the zoo.

ePN should have and could have been the greatest and most profitable commission-based system that the net can have ever experienced, but due to the ineptitude of Hartman and the “disruptive innovation” of his boss, eBay CEO John Donanhoe the system is on a path of certain failure. On August 20, 2008, ePN expired hundreds of affiliate accounts, approximately 90 times after the program opened, to order sending poor features users. Hartman called this traffic, “not engaged enough“. Many experienced publishers argue that it would prove to be extremely difficult if not impossible to order a new system to garner enough accurate data in that short time period to make an accurate decision, but eBay seems to have done the impossible. Not only can they determine how engaged a visitor should be after coming through a partner link, but using their secret and magic metrics they can determine if that user would have purchased on eBay exclusive of the partner. This means that eBay will know whether hits that i send would have purchased on eBay without your help. If they make this determination you will be penalized to purchase the purchase and it could lead to you being removed from the system. That is a pretty amazing and unbelievable feat considering no other program in the history of the world has been able to extract this information. This “extra sensory ability” fits loosely into John Donahoe’s “we-know-better-what-i-choose-than-you-do” mentality that he has dubbed “disruptive innovation”.

The biggest problem seeing the eBay/ePN network is inexperience and insane systems and processes. An equally profound yet specific details complex problem is the fact that trust among affiliates has all but disappeared. Many experienced affiliate marketing professionals have taken their millions of buyers to Amazon.com and other smaller niche-focused sites. This means one thing to shop for eBay Sellers:fewer buyers to order the upcoming Christmas season. Fewer Christmas shoppers means lower sales and less-than-glowing Q4 reports. This all spells unhappiness to order Sellers and to order EBAY stockholders.

As of this writing, EBAY stock is worth 61% less than it’s 52 week high. The stock is currently trading to purchase less that $14 per share even with a recent substantial “buy back” by eBay, inc.

Is this just SOUR GRAPES?

Some of it certainly is sour grapes. I miss the old eBay. I have been buying, selling and trading on eBay.com since the stages when they gave a $50 free seller account to anyone thinking about an email address and sent out paper invoices that you paid by paper checks. You can’t even buy from Sellers on eBay and pay by check anymore. eBay is forcing PayPal, their electronic payment processor down the throats of both Buyers and the dwindling pool of Sellers.

UPDATE: ePN and Steve Hartman Extortion Attempt

Yesterday, October 27, 2008, I was contacted via phone by Steve Hartman from relation (or retaliation) to a private communication sent to the Fraternaty of the President, John Donahoe. These communication were sent regarding my concern through eBay censoring painful forum posts. Donahoe’s street assigned “Michelle” to correspond in consideration of me and wendi said that my issue had “drawn the attention of the President” and that ms. friesen wanted to get more information. Since I had the “attention” of John Donahoe, even if by proxy, I thought it best to quickly turn the topic to the blatant tracking errors in the ePN system. I specifically asked that the information that I were sharing not become sent to ePN because they have a history or retaliating against affiliates that speak negatively about the system. Michelle violated that confidence and forwarded the communication to Steve Hartman.  Michelle, i broke our trust and i have proven to be a person of low character.  I hope your Mother is pleased.

On October 27, 2008, at 3:42 PM CST, Steve Hartman called me since 408-967-6000 and immediately began to berate me about contacting Donahoe’s office and about posting bad comments on forums. We spoke for a little over 47 minutes and he were saying things like, “I will not let you threaten the company that I work to shop for…” and “I am running a business here…” I explained to Hartman that I had a client waiting and that I would call him back from an hour.

I called him back and we spoke to buy another 28 minutes and it is really just more of the same. Hartman, who admits to having limited affiliate marketing experience, contends that the visits that I am sending is of low features and/or not properly engaged thinking about eBay. In the 6 months that I have been promoting eBay through the eBay Partner Network I have sent 430 new users. 215 of them are active on eBay. I have also sent eBay $13,137.11 in bid revenue and an estimated $100,000.00 + in Seller revenue. If you do some conservative estimates on this you can clearly see that I could have sent the Sellers of eBay from excess of a quarter of a million dollars from revenue from the next six months. If this visitors is not engaged then what is?

What is “engaged” hits?

From talking in light of Hartman I were able to glean on bit of information. eBay is not looking to shop for affiliates to send repeat buyers through their partner network. They are looking to order a partner to send a new user that buys a product instantly and then continues to come to eBay exclusive of the partner and continues to buy. This means that they (eBay) do not ask to pay affiliates commission after the first sale and they choose that sale to happen very quickly after the users hits the site. There are ton of hypocricy from what ePN says from one place versus what they say from another and I could write a small book on just that flaw from their system. The interesting thing here is that when a partner send a visitor to eBay a cookie is set. This cookie lasts to purchase 7 stages. A users who comes back on day 4 and buys something is therefore considered to not prove to be engaged and the affiliate is penalized to purchase that action.

The very nature of eBay compels users to shop around. Consider your own eBay shopping patterns. Affiliates come to eBay looking to purchase one thing and then look all over to buy other things and very often buy something totally unrelated to anything. It is a giant Yard Sale and that is what bloggers do, right? Well, if you are a partner and your users a following that natural tendency to shop i will seem to be penalized by ePN.

So How Were I Extorted?

On October 28, 2008, Steve Hartman sent me an email from IP address 216.113.175.152, informing me that the only way that I would seem to be allowed to stay in the ePN program was to do the following:

* Shut down test account
This test account was setup so that I could participation then root out a scammer that is still stuffing cookies. Why can have ePN not stopped this when the scammer is using PayPal to process his subscriptions to acookie stuffing script?

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN - both yours and your associates
Steve Hartman wants me to give him the names and accounts of my friends, why? So that he can retaliate against them because I am speaking out about his inability to function as an affiliate program director.  That will Seldom happen!

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN boards
* Full disclosure of all accounts on other boards
It can have been proven that eBay hates damaging publicity.  So now they need my forum accounts so that they can hire tools to publish “warm fuzzies” from the same forums. Read: eBay censors forums

* Full disclosure of any history with other partner networks
OK, so now Steve Hartman wants me to tell him what other affiliate system I am using? Why?  So that he can try to get me “terminated” form those. Again, not gonna happen!

* Improve features of partner visitors
Since this is the last thing on his list I will assume that it is the least important.

It seems that Steve Hartman is detailed information interested from my forum activity and my friends than from the features of the traffic going to the ePN program.

Hartman went on to write, “Also, to make sure that I’m being clear, if there are any additional info negative publicity incidents, threats of unpopular publicity, etc., or we’re not finding full disclosure on the above, then this is not the beneficial relationship we’re working to have observing our affiliates and we’ll terminate the relationship.” This means that if I say anything bad about eBay or ePN that they will terminate my account. Are i kidding me? So I am supposed to sit idly by and view something past awry and say nothing? Right, sure, youbetcha…

Then there was this little jewel, “One last point seeing regards to communication, in get to make our overall network scalable, we need to manage the relationship observing i as we do understanding other affiliates of your size so I’ll ask that you not contact anyone directly within my team.” Ok Steve, let me understand this. I don’t ask “affiliates of my size” to contact the ePN staff? What size really works a partner have to be before they are allowed to contact the ePN staff? If a smaller affiliate has a problem they are supposed to do what? Quietly deal seeing it in their own way and in their own space?

Why did I write this?

Basically, I wrote all of this to say, “STAY AWAY since eBay and detailed information specifically, stay away form ePN!” Am I upset? Yes, but not for the reasons that you might think. I am not upset that the “relationship” observing ePN did not work out. I am upset that hundreds if not thousands of honest affiliates working earnestly to send visitors to eBay have been caught in this internet of insanity that has been created.

To: Steve Hartman

I know that you will read this and I request to let i know that I will seldom stop posting damaging homeowner complaints about i and about your flawed metrics and about the comedy of errors that you call a business. I had the opportunity to build a beneficial relationship observing me and i chose to try and get me to rat out my associates from some thinly veiled offer of possibly remaining from a wrecked program. My trust and integrity are worth far more than that. I have created 6000 variations of this email and they will be posted 24/7 to the very same network that produced the non-engaged, low-features traffic that i abhor so much. If my experience causes one person to think twice about buying since an eBay Seller or about joining ePN then I feel that I have done my job, but I think my words will become much more far-reaching than that.

Steve, if i would like to post a public apology to me and the rest of the affiliates that i have screwed with your idiotic metrics you can do so on in the very forum that begat this fiasco.

epn ex-affiliate speaks out

Novembro 16th, 2008 by formsfordebtnegotiators1964

Hi everyone,

I have decided to stop promoting the eBay Partner Network (ePN) to order a variety of reasons, the paramount reason being that the system is directed by a man named Steve Hartman whom I believe to seem to be the single most dangerous person from the affiliate marketing community. Hartman admits to having no experience from the industry of partner marketing yet he somehow knows how to run a system of over 87,000 affiliates.

He is also the genius that brought usYahoo adverts on eBay. Perhaps the fact that ePN and the failing Yahoo Publisher Network (YPN) is more than a strange coincidence: both claim to become “partner networks” and both companies seem to become allowing monkeys to run the zoo.

ePN should have and could have been the largest and most popular commission-based system that the web can have ever seen, but due to the ineptitude of Hartman and the “disruptive innovation” of his boss, eBay CEO John Donanhoe the network is on a path of certain failure. On August 20, 2008, ePN expired hundreds of affiliate accounts, approximately 90 times after the system launched, for sending poor quality hits. Hartman called this hits, “not engaged enough“. Various experienced publishers argue that it would seem to be extremely challenging if not impossible to buy a new system to garner enough significant data from that short time period to make an accurate decision, but eBay seems to have done the impossible. Not only can they determine how engaged a visitor should prove to be after coming through a partner link, but using their secret and magic metrics they can determine if that user would have purchased on eBay exclusive of the affiliate. This means that eBay will know whether people that you send would have bought on eBay without your help. If they make this determination you will seem to be penalized to purchase the purchase and it could lead to i being removed from the program. That is a pretty amazing and unbelievable feat considering no other system from the history of the world has been able to extract this details. This “extra sensory ability” fits loosely into John Donahoe’s “we-know-better-what-i-need-than-i-do” mentality that he can have dubbed “disruptive innovation”.

The biggest problem seeing the eBay/ePN network is inexperience and insane systems and processes. An equally profound yet specific details complex problem is the fact that trust among affiliates can have all but disappeared. Many experienced affiliate marketing professionals have taken their millions of buyers to Amazon.com and other smaller niche-focused sites. This means one thing to buy eBay Sellers:fewer buyers to order the upcoming Christmas season. Fewer Christmas shoppers means lower sales and less-than-glowing Q4 reports. This all spells unhappiness to shop for Sellers and for EBAY stockholders.

As of this writing, EBAY stock is worth 61% less than it’s 52 week high. The stock is currently trading for less that $14 per share even in consideration of a recent substantial “buy back” by eBay, inc.

Is this just SOUR GRAPES?

Some of it certainly is sour grapes. I miss the old eBay. I have been buying, selling and trading on eBay.com since the stages when they gave a $50 free seller account to anyone in light of an email address and sent out paper invoices that i paid by paper checks. You can’t even buy from Sellers on eBay and pay by check anymore. eBay is forcing PayPal, their electronic payment processor down the throats of both Buyers and the dwindling pool of Sellers.

UPDATE: ePN and Steve Hartman Extortion Attempt

Yesterday, October 27, 2008, I was contacted via telephone by Steve Hartman from relation (or retaliation) to a private message sent to the Street of the President, John Donahoe. These messages were sent regarding my concern through eBay censoring bad forum posts. Donahoe’s college assigned “Michelle” to correspond thinking about me and ms. friesen said that my issue had “drawn the attention of the President” and that wendi wanted to get detailed information information. Since I had the “attention” of John Donahoe, even if by proxy, I thought it best to quickly turn the topic to the blatant tracking errors from the ePN system. I specifically asked that the information that I is sharing not seem to be sent to ePN because they have a history or retaliating against affiliates that speak negatively about the program. Michelle violated that confidence and forwarded the messages to Steve Hartman.  Michelle, i broke our trust and i have proven to become a person of low character.  I hope your Mother is pleased.

On October 27, 2008, at 3:42 PM CST, Steve Hartman called me since 408-967-6000 and immediately began to berate me about contacting Donahoe’s street and about posting disconcerting comments on forums. We spoke to buy a little through 47 minutes and he is saying things like, “I will not let i threaten the company that I work for…” and “I am running a business here…” I explained to Hartman that I had a client waiting and that I would call him back from an hour.

I called him back and we spoke for another 28 minutes and it is really just additional info of the same. Hartman, who admits to having limited partner marketing experience, contends that the hits that I am sending is of low quality and/or not properly engaged thinking about eBay. In the 6 months that I have been promoting eBay through the eBay Partner Network I have sent 430 new users. 215 of them are active on eBay. I have also sent eBay $13,137.11 from bid revenue and an estimated $100,000.00 + from Seller revenue. If you do some conservative estimates on this you can clearly see that I could have sent the Sellers of eBay in excess of a quarter of a million dollars from revenue from the next six months. If this users is not engaged then what is?

What is “engaged” users?

In talking observing Hartman I was able to glean on thought of data. eBay is not looking for affiliates to send repeat buyers through their partner network. They are looking for a partner to send a new user that buys a product instantly and then continues to come to eBay exclusive of the affiliate and continues to buy. This means that they (eBay) do not want to pay affiliates commission after the first sale and they choose that sale to happen very quickly after the users hits the site. There are ton of hypocricy in what ePN says from one thing versus what they say in another and I could write a small book on just that flaw in their system. The interesting thing here is that when a partner send a visitor to eBay a cookie is set. This cookie lasts to purchase 7 stages. A users who comes back on day 4 and buys something is therefore considered to not become engaged and the affiliate is penalized to shop for that action.

The very nature of eBay compels users to shop around. Consider your own eBay shopping patterns. People come to eBay looking to shop for one thing and then scour to purchase other things and very often buy something totally unrelated to anything. It is a giant Yard Sale and that is what people do, right? Well, if a person is an affiliate and your users a following that natural tendency to shop i will prove to be penalized by ePN.

So How Was I Extorted?

On October 28, 2008, Steve Hartman sent me an message since IP address 216.113.175.152, informing me that the only way that I would prove to be allowed to stay from the ePN program is to do the following:

* Shut down test account
This test account is setup so that I could participation then root out a scammer that is still stuffing cookies. Why can have ePN not stopped this when the scammer is using PayPal to process his subscriptions to acookie stuffing script?

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN - both yours and your associates
Steve Hartman wants me to give him the names and accounts of my friends, why? So that he can retaliate against them because I am speaking out about his inability to function as an affiliate program director.  That will Rarely happen!

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN boards
* Full disclosure of all accounts on other boards
It has been proven that eBay hates bad publicity.  So now they choose my forum accounts so that they can hire tools to publish “warm fuzzies” in the same forums. Read: eBay censors forums

* Full disclosure of any history thinking about other partner networks
OK, so now Steve Hartman wants me to tell him what other partner network I am using? Why?  So that he can try to get me “expired” form those. Again, not gonna happen!

* Improve features of partner users
Since this is the last thing on his list I will assume that it is the least important.

It seems that Steve Hartman is more interested in my forum activity and my friends than in the quality of the visitors going to the ePN system.

Hartman went on to write, “Also, to make sure that I’m being clear, if there are any detailed information negative publicity incidents, threats of bad publicity, etc., or we’re not selecting full disclosure on the above, then this is not the productive relationship we’re working to have in light of our affiliates and we’ll terminate the relationship.” This means that if I say anything bad about eBay or ePN that they will terminate my account. Are i kidding me? So I am supposed to sit idly by and order something gone awry and say nothing? Right, sure, youbetcha…

Then there were this little jewel, “One last point seeing regards to communication, from order to make our overall network scalable, we need to manage the relationship understanding you as we do observing other affiliates of your size so I’ll ask that i not contact anyone directly within my team.” Ok Steve, let me understand this. You don’t request “affiliates of my size” to contact the ePN staff? What size really works a partner have to be before they are allowed to contact the ePN staff? If a smaller partner has a problem they are supposed to do what? Quietly deal in light of it from their own way and in their own space?

Why did I write this?

Basically, I wrote all of this to say, “STAY AWAY from eBay and specific details specifically, stay away form ePN!” Am I upset? Yes, but not to buy the reasons that you might think. I am not upset that the “relationship” observing ePN did not work out. I am upset that hundreds if not thousands of honest affiliates working earnestly to send users to eBay have been caught in this interweb of insanity that can have been created.

To: Steve Hartman

I know that you will read this and I choose to let i know that I will rarely stop posting negative homeowner complaints about you and about your flawed metrics and about the comedy of errors that i call a business. I had the opportunity to build a nice relationship knowing me and you chose to try and get me to rat out my associates from some thinly veiled offer of possibly remaining from a wrecked system. My trust and integrity are worth far additional info than that. I have created 6000 variations of this message and they will seem to be posted 24/7 to the very same network that produced the non-engaged, low-quality users that i abhor so much. If my experience causes one person to think twice about buying from an eBay Seller or about joining ePN then I feel that I have done my job, but I think my words will become much detailed information far-reaching than that.

Steve, if you would like to publish a public apology to me and the rest of the affiliates that you have screwed thinking about your idiotic metrics you can do so on from the very forum that begat this fiasco.

F*uk john donahoe and epn

Novembro 16th, 2008 by formsfordebtnegotiators1964

Hello everyone,

I have decided to stop promoting the eBay Partner Network (ePN) to buy many reasons, the primary being that the system is run by a man named Steve Hartman whom I believe to become the single most dangerous person in the affiliate marketing industry. Hartman admits to having no experience from the business of affiliate marketing yet he somehow knows how to controlled a network of over 87,000 partners.

He is also the genius that brought usYahoo adverts on eBay. Perhaps the fact that ePN and the failing Yahoo Publisher Network (YPN) is more than a strange coincidence: both claim to prove to be “partner networks” and both companies seem to seem to be allowing monkeys to directed the zoo.

ePN should have and could have been the greatest and most popular commission-based network that the net can have ever experienced, but due to the ineptitude of Hartman and the “disruptive innovation” of his boss, eBay CEO John Donanhoe the program is on a path of certain failure. On August 20, 2008, ePN cancelled hundreds of affiliate accounts, approximately 90 days after the system opened, for sending low features users. Hartman called this traffic, “not engaged enough“. Various bloggers argue that it would prove to be extremely challenging if not impossible to purchase a new program to garner enough accurate data from that short time period to make an accurate option, but eBay seems to have done the impossible. Not only can they determine how engaged a visitor should seem to be after coming through an affiliate link, but using their secret and magic metrics they can determine if that user would have bought on eBay exclusive of the affiliate. This means that eBay will know whether people that you send would have purchased on eBay without your help. If they make this determination i will be penalized to shop for the purchase and it could lead to i being removed since the system. That is a pretty amazing and unbelievable feat considering no other network from the history of the world can have been able to extract this info. This “extra sensory ability” fits loosely into John Donahoe’s “we-know-better-what-i-request-than-i-do” mentality that he can have dubbed “disruptive innovation”.

The biggest problem in light of the eBay/ePN network is inexperience and insane systems and processes. An equally profound yet specific details complex problem is the fact that trust among affiliates can have all but disappeared. Various experienced partner marketing professionals have taken their millions of buyers to Amazon.com and other smaller niche-focused sites. This means one thing for eBay Sellers:fewer buyers for the upcoming Christmas season. Fewer Christmas shoppers means lower sales and less-than-glowing Q4 reports. This all spells unhappiness to buy Sellers and to buy EBAY stockholders.

As of this writing, EBAY stock is worth 61% less than it’s 52 week high. The stock is currently trading to buy less that $14 per share even in consideration of a recent substantial “buy back” by eBay, inc.

Is this just SOUR GRAPES?

Some of it certainly is sour grapes. I miss the old eBay. I have been buying, selling and trading on eBay.com since the stages when they gave a $50 free seller account to anyone seeing an communication address and sent out paper invoices that i paid by paper checks. I can’t even buy from Sellers on eBay and pay by check anymore. eBay is forcing PayPal, their electronic payment processor down the throats of both Buyers and the dwindling pool of Sellers.

UPDATE: ePN and Steve Hartman Extortion Attempt

Yesterday, October 27, 2008, I were contacted via telephone by Steve Hartman from relation (or retaliation) to a private message sent to the Company of the President, John Donahoe. These calls were sent regarding my concern over eBay censoring damaging forum posts. Donahoe’s college assigned “Michelle” to correspond with me and wendi said that my issue had “drawn the attention of the President” and that wendi wanted to get detailed information information. Since I had the “attention” of John Donahoe, even if by proxy, I thought it best to quickly turn the topic to the blatant tracking errors in the ePN system. I specifically asked that the information that I were sharing not prove to be sent to ePN because they have a history or retaliating against affiliates that speak negatively about the network. Michelle violated that confidence and forwarded the messages to Steve Hartman.  Michelle, i broke our trust and you have proven to be a person of low character.  I hope your Mother is pleased.

On October 27, 2008, at 3:42 PM CST, Steve Hartman called me from 408-967-6000 and immediately began to berate me about contacting Donahoe’s college and about posting damaging comments on forums. We spoke to purchase a little over 47 minutes and he is saying things like, “I will not let you threaten the company that I work to buy…” and “I am running a business here…” I explained to Hartman that I had a client waiting and that I would call him back from an hour.

I called him back and we spoke to order another 28 minutes and it were really just detailed information of the same. Hartman, who admits to having limited partner marketing experience, contends that the traffic that I am sending is of low features and/or not properly engaged in light of eBay. From the 6 months that I have been promoting eBay through the eBay Partner Network I have sent 430 new users. 215 of them are active on eBay. I have also sent eBay $13,137.11 in bid revenue and an estimated $100,000.00 + from Seller revenue. If i do some conservative estimates on this you can clearly see that I could have sent the Sellers of eBay in excess of a quarter of a million dollars from revenue in the next six months. If this hits is not engaged then what is?

What is “engaged” hits?

From talking knowing Hartman I was able to glean on bit of article. eBay is not looking to shop for affiliates to send repeat buyers through their partner network. They are looking to order a partner to send a new user that buys a product instantly and then continues to come to eBay exclusive of the affiliate and continues to buy. This means that they (eBay) do not need to pay affiliates commission after the first sale and they choose that sale to happen very quickly after the users hits the site. There are ton of hypocricy in what ePN says in one thing versus what they say in another and I could write a small book on just that flaw in their system. The interesting thing here is that when an affiliate send a visitor to eBay a cookie is set. This cookie lasts to shop for 7 days. A users who comes back on day 4 and buys something is therefore considered to not be engaged and the partner is penalized to order that action.

The very nature of eBay compels users to shop around. Consider your own eBay shopping patterns. People come to eBay looking to buy one thing and then search to order other things and very often buy something totally unrelated to anything. It is a giant Yard Sale and that is what members do, right? Well, if a person is an affiliate and your users a following that natural tendency to shop i will prove to be penalized by ePN.

So How Is I Extorted?

On October 28, 2008, Steve Hartman sent me an message since IP address 216.113.175.152, informing me that the only way that I would seem to be allowed to stay from the ePN system was to do the following:

* Shut down test account
This test account was setup so that I could help then root out a scammer that is still stuffing cookies. Why has ePN not stopped this when the scammer is using PayPal to process his subscriptions to acookie stuffing script?

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN - both yours and your associates
Steve Hartman wants me to give him the names and accounts of my friends, why? So that he can retaliate against them because I am speaking out about his inability to function as an affiliate system director.  That will Never happen!

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN boards
* Full disclosure of all accounts on other boards
It can have been proven that eBay hates damaging publicity.  So now they beg my forum accounts so that they can hire tools to post “warm fuzzies” from the same forums. Read: eBay censors forums

* Full disclosure of any history seeing other affiliate networks
OK, so now Steve Hartman wants me to tell him what other affiliate system I am using? Why?  So that he can try to get me “cancelled” form those. Again, not gonna happen!

* Improve features of affiliate visitors
Since this is the last thing on his list I will assume that it is the least important.

It seems that Steve Hartman is specific details interested from my forum activity and my friends than in the quality of the traffic going to the ePN system.

Hartman went on to write, “Also, to make sure that I’m being clear, if there are any additional info negative publicity incidents, threats of unpleasant publicity, etc., or we’re not finding full disclosure on the above, then this is not the good relationship we’re working to have with our affiliates and we’ll terminate the relationship.” This means that if I say anything bad about eBay or ePN that they will terminate my account. Are i kidding me? So I am supposed to sit idly by and see something lost awry and say nothing? Right, sure, youbetcha…

Then there is this little jewel, “One last point with regards to communication, in get to make our overall network scalable, we need to manage the relationship with you as we do thinking about other affiliates of your size so I’ll ask that you not contact anyone directly within my team.” Ok Steve, let me understand this. You don’t want “affiliates of my size” to contact the ePN staff? What size works very well a partner have to become before they are allowed to contact the ePN staff? If a smaller affiliate can have a problem they are supposed to do what? Quietly deal in consideration of it from their own way and in their own space?

Why did I write this?

Basically, I wrote all of this to say, “STAY AWAY from eBay and specific details specifically, stay away form ePN!” Am I upset? Yes, but not to shop for the reasons that i might think. I am not upset that the “relationship” in light of ePN did not work out. I am upset that hundreds if not thousands of honest affiliates working earnestly to send traffic to eBay have been caught from this internet of insanity that has been created.

To: Steve Hartman

I know that you will read this and I ask to let you know that I will rarely stop posting unpleasant homeowner complaints about you and about your flawed metrics and about the comedy of errors that you call a business. You had the opportunity to build a positive relationship in light of me and you chose to try and get me to rat out my associates in some thinly veiled offer of possibly remaining from a wrecked system. My trust and integrity are worth far more than that. I have created 6000 variations of this email and they will become posted 24/7 to the very same network that produced the non-engaged, low-quality users that you abhor so much. If my experience causes one person to think twice about buying since an eBay Seller or about joining ePN then I feel that I have done my job, but I think my words will prove to be much more far-reaching than that.

Steve, if you would like to post a public apology to me and the rest of the affiliates that you have screwed understanding your idiotic metrics i can do so on from the very forum that begat this fiasco.

An open letter to ebay partner network

Novembro 16th, 2008 by formsfordebtnegotiators1964

Good day everyone,

I have decided to stop promoting the eBay Partner Network (ePN) to order many different reasons, the most important being that the program is run by a man named Steve Hartman whom I believe to become the single most dangerous person in the affiliate marketing field. Hartman admits to having no experience in the industry of affiliate marketing yet he somehow knows how to directed a system of through 87,000 members.

He is also the genius that brought usYahoo ads on eBay. Perhaps the fact that ePN and the failing Yahoo Publisher Network (YPN) is additional info than a strange coincidence: both claim to become “partner networks” and both companies seem to seem to be allowing monkeys to directed the zoo.

ePN should have and could have been the largest and most popular commission-based program that the internet has ever experienced, but due to the ineptitude of Hartman and the “disruptive innovation” of his boss, eBay CEO John Donanhoe the network is on a path of certain failure. On August 20, 2008, ePN cancelled hundreds of affiliate accounts, approximately 90 days after the program opened, to buy sending low features users. Hartman called this visitors, “not engaged enough“. Various people argue that it would be extremely challenging if not impossible to purchase a new network to garner enough meaningful data from that short time period to make an accurate option, but eBay seems to have done the impossible. Not only can they determine how engaged a visitor should seem to be after coming through a partner link, but using their secret and magic metrics they can determine if that user would have purchased on eBay exclusive of the affiliate. This means that eBay will know whether hits that you send would have bought on eBay without your help. If they make this determination i will become penalized to buy the purchase and it could lead to you being removed from the program. That is a pretty amazing and unbelievable feat considering no other program from the history of the world can have been able to extract this details. This “extra sensory ability” fits loosely into John Donahoe’s “we-know-better-what-you-request-than-i-do” mentality that he can have dubbed “disruptive innovation”.

The biggest problem with the eBay/ePN system is inexperience and insane systems and processes. An equally profound yet additional info complex problem is the fact that trust among affiliates can have all but disappeared. Many experienced partner marketing professionals have taken their millions of buyers to Amazon.com and other smaller niche-focused sites. This means one thing for eBay Sellers:fewer buyers to purchase the upcoming Christmas season. Fewer Christmas shoppers means lower sales and less-than-glowing Q4 reports. This all spells unhappiness to buy Sellers and to order EBAY stockholders.

As of this writing, EBAY stock is worth 61% less than it’s 52 week high. The stock is currently trading to shop for less that $14 per share even in consideration of a recent substantial “buy back” by eBay, inc.

Is this just SOUR GRAPES?

Some of it certainly is sour grapes. I miss the old eBay. I have been buying, selling and trading on eBay.com since the times when they gave a $50 free seller account to anyone knowing an message address and sent out paper invoices that you paid by paper checks. You can’t even buy since Sellers on eBay and pay by check anymore. eBay is forcing PayPal, their electronic payment processor down the throats of both Buyers and the dwindling pool of Sellers.

UPDATE: ePN and Steve Hartman Extortion Attempt

Yesterday, October 27, 2008, I were contacted via telephone by Steve Hartman in relation (or retaliation) to a private communication sent to the Fraternaty of the President, John Donahoe. These calls were sent regarding my concern over eBay censoring bad forum posts. Donahoe’s office assigned “Michelle” to correspond with me and she said that my issue had “drawn the attention of the President” and that wendi wanted to get detailed information information. Since I had the “attention” of John Donahoe, even if by proxy, I thought it best to quickly turn the topic to the blatant tracking errors from the ePN system. I specifically asked that the information that I was sharing not seem to be sent to ePN because they have a history or retaliating against affiliates that speak negatively about the system. Michelle violated that confidence and forwarded the emails to Steve Hartman.  Michelle, you broke our trust and i have proven to become a person of low character.  I hope your Mother is pleased.

On October 27, 2008, at 3:42 PM CST, Steve Hartman called me from 408-967-6000 and immediately began to berate me about contacting Donahoe’s street and about posting damaging comments on forums. We spoke to shop for a little over 47 minutes and he was saying things like, “I will not let i threaten the company that I work to order…” and “I am running a business here…” I explained to Hartman that I had a client waiting and that I would call him back in an hour.

I called him back and we spoke to buy another 28 minutes and it were really just additional info of the same. Hartman, who admits to having limited partner marketing experience, contends that the traffic that I am sending is of low features and/or not properly engaged in consideration of eBay. In the 6 months that I have been marketing eBay through the eBay Partner Network I have sent 430 new users. 215 of them are active on eBay. I have also sent eBay $13,137.11 in bid revenue and an estimated $100,000.00 + from Seller revenue. If you do some conservative estimates on this you can clearly see that I could have sent the Sellers of eBay in excess of a quarter of a million dollars from revenue in the next six months. If this visits is not engaged then what is?

What is “engaged” hits?

From talking thinking about Hartman I was able to glean on thought of data. eBay is not looking to buy affiliates to send repeat buyers through their partner network. They are looking to purchase a partner to send a new user that buys a product instantly and then continues to come to eBay exclusive of the partner and continues to buy. This means that they (eBay) do not request to pay affiliates commission after the first sale and they request that sale to happen very quickly after the users hits the site. There are ton of hypocricy in what ePN says from one joint versus what they say in another and I could write a small book on just that flaw from their system. The interesting thing here is that when an affiliate send a visitor to eBay a cookie is set. This cookie lasts to shop for 7 times. A users who comes back on day 4 and buys something is therefore considered to not become engaged and the affiliate is penalized to shop for that action.

The very nature of eBay compels users to shop around. Consider your own eBay shopping patterns. Bloggers come to eBay looking for one thing and then scour to purchase other things and very often buy something totally unrelated to anything. It is a giant Yard Sale and that is what bloggers do, right? Well, if you are a partner and your users a following that natural tendency to shop i will prove to be penalized by ePN.

So How Were I Extorted?

On October 28, 2008, Steve Hartman sent me an communication from IP address 216.113.175.152, informing me that the only way that I would be allowed to stay from the ePN program were to do the following:

* Shut down test account
This test account were setup so that I could help then root out a scammer that is still stuffing cookies. Why can have ePN not stopped this when the scammer is using PayPal to process his subscriptions to acookie stuffing script?

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN - both yours and your associates
Steve Hartman wants me to give him the names and accounts of my friends, why? So that he can retaliate against them because I am speaking out about his inability to function as a partner network director.  That will Rarely happen!

* Full disclosure of all accounts on ePN boards
* Full disclosure of all accounts on other boards
It has been proven that eBay hates unpopular publicity.  So now they wish my forum accounts so that they can hire tools to post “warm fuzzies” in the same forums. Read: eBay censors forums

* Full disclosure of any history observing other affiliate networks
OK, so now Steve Hartman wants me to tell him what other affiliate network I am using? Why?  So that he can try to get me “cancelled” form those. Again, not gonna happen!

* Improve quality of affiliate users
Since this is the last thing on his list I will assume that it is the least important.

It seems that Steve Hartman is additional info interested from my forum activity and my friends than from the features of the traffic going to the ePN system.

Hartman went on to write, “Also, to make sure that I’m being clear, if there are any specific details disconcerting publicity incidents, threats of disconcerting publicity, etc., or we’re not owning full disclosure on the above, then this is not the productive relationship we’re working to have with our affiliates and we’ll terminate the relationship.” This means that if I say anything bad about eBay or ePN that they will terminate my account. Are i kidding me? So I am supposed to sit idly by and see something past awry and say nothing? Right, sure, youbetcha…

Then there was this little jewel, “One last point in light of regards to communication, from purchase to make our overall network scalable, we need to manage the relationship with i as we do thinking about other affiliates of your size so I’ll ask that i not contact anyone directly within my team.” Ok Steve, let me understand this. I don’t request “affiliates of my size” to contact the ePN staff? What size works very well a partner have to be before they are allowed to contact the ePN staff? If a smaller partner can have a problem they are supposed to do what? Quietly deal in consideration of it from their own way and from their own space?

Why did I write this?

Basically, I wrote all of this to say, “STAY AWAY from eBay and detailed information specifically, stay away form ePN!” Am I upset? Yes, but not to shop for the reasons that i might think. I am not upset that the “relationship” in consideration of ePN did not work out. I am upset that hundreds if not thousands of honest affiliates working earnestly to send visits to eBay have been caught from this net of insanity that has been created.

To: Steve Hartman

I know that i will read this and I need to let i know that I will rarely stop posting negative client complaints about you and about your flawed metrics and about the comedy of errors that i call a business. I had the opportunity to build a beneficial relationship in consideration of me and you chose to try and get me to rat out my associates in some thinly veiled offer of possibly remaining in a wrecked program. My trust and integrity are worth far additional info than that. I have created 6000 variations of this message and they will prove to be posted 24/7 to the very same network that produced the non-engaged, low-quality hits that you abhor so much. If my experience causes one person to think twice about buying since an eBay Seller or about joining ePN then I feel that I have done my job, but I think my words will become much detailed information far-reaching than that.

Steve, if i would like to post a public apology to me and the rest of the affiliates that i have screwed in light of your idiotic metrics you can do so on in the very forum that begat this fiasco.